[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: inductance - parallel strips

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: inductance - parallel strips
- From: Tomislav Borzic <tborzic@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:36:33 -0800 (PST)

    Hello Jim, I solved this problem.
    Problem was that part of the flux was closing through
    conductor.So I changed boundary conditions to force
    the
    flux to stay BETWEEN conductors, not in them.
    Femm file is attached.
    Results:
    L(femm)=1.1517 e-6 H/m

    F1 L=lambda* N^2

    lambda=mio*b/h,
    b=distance between conductors (not their radius)
    h-height

    L(F1)=1.1 e-6 H/m

    ***
    i have another question, regarding complex inductance.
    inductance doesn't depend of current, so often in
    numerical
    examples it is not given.so if I want to achieve same
    result
    as numerical (with current not given, but other
    parameters are)
    how can I solve similar problem in femm?
    thanx
    Tomislav

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
    http://personals.yahoo.com

    [Format] = 3.0
    [Frequency] = 0
    [Precision] = 1e-008
    [LengthUnits] = centimeters
    [ProblemType] = planar
    [Coordinates] = cartesian
    [Comment] = "Add comments here."
    [PointProps] = 0
    [BdryProps] = 0
    [BlockProps] = 3
    <BeginBlock>
    <BlockName> = "Air"
    <Mu_x> = 1
    <Mu_y> = 1
    <H_c> = 0
    <H_cAngle> = 0
    <J_re> = 0
    <J_im> = 0
    <Sigma> = 0
    <d_lam> = 0
    <Phi_h> = 0
    <LamType> = 0
    <LamFill> = 1
    <BHPoints> = 0
    <EndBlock>
    <BeginBlock>
    <BlockName> = "Copper"
    <Mu_x> = 1
    <Mu_y> = 1
    <H_c> = 0
    <H_cAngle> = 0
    <J_re> = 0
    <J_im> = 0
    <Sigma> = 58
    <d_lam> = 0
    <Phi_h> = 0
    <LamType> = 0
    <LamFill> = 1
    <BHPoints> = 0
    <EndBlock>
    <BeginBlock>
    <BlockName> = "Pure Iron"
    <Mu_x> = 14872
    <Mu_y> = 14872
    <H_c> = 0
    <H_cAngle> = 0
    <J_re> = 0
    <J_im> = 0
    <Sigma> = 10.44
    <d_lam> = 0
    <Phi_h> = 0
    <LamType> = 0
    <LamFill> = 1
    <BHPoints> = 0
    <EndBlock>
    [CircuitProps] = 2
    <BeginCircuit>
    <CircuitName> = "+"
    <VoltGradient_re> = 0
    <VoltGradient_im> = 0
    <TotalAmps_re> = 1
    <TotalAmps_im> = 0
    <CircuitType> = 0
    <EndCircuit>
    <BeginCircuit>
    <CircuitName> = "-"
    <VoltGradient_re> = 0
    <VoltGradient_im> = 0
    <TotalAmps_re> = -1
    <TotalAmps_im> = 0
    <CircuitType> = 0
    <EndCircuit>
    [NumPoints] = 8
    0	0	0	0
    1	0	0	0
    15	0	0	0
    16	0	0	0
    0	16	0	0
    1	16	0	0
    15	16	0	0
    16	16	0	0
    [NumSegments] = 10
    4	5	-1	0	0	0
    5	1	-1	0	0	0
    1	0	-1	0	0	0
    0	4	-1	0	0	0
    6	7	-1	0	0	0
    7	3	-1	0	0	0
    3	2	-1	0	0	0
    2	6	-1	0	0	0
    5	6	-1	0	0	0
    2	1	-1	0	0	0
    [NumArcSegments] = 0
    [NumHoles] = 0
    [NumBlockLabels] = 3
    0.40000000000000002	11.6	2	0.20000000000000001	2	0	0
    7	11.4	3	0.40000000000000002	0	0	0
    15.6	11.4	2	0.20000000000000001	1	0	0

- Prev by Date: similar software
- Next by Date: Re: [femm] similar software
- Previous by thread: Re: [femm] similar software
- Next by thread: Re: [femm] Neumann boundary condition
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread