[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: PM design - Simulation results far from Prototype results....

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: PM design - Simulation results far from Prototype results....
- From: "tonyrouget" <tonyrouget@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:50:34 -0000
- In-reply-to: <20030624090305.23552.qmail@web80510.mail.yahoo.com>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Dear All,
    Thanks for your help and share of knowledge...

    1)I am pretty sure about the Neo35H since I have the spec sheet and
    it's a reliable supplier,

    however I wasn't expecting the Steel to be one of my problem..Maybe I
    have too much saturation in my design..

    Is 1.2T saturated for 1018 steel ?? I thought it was a bit higher for
    the 1018..

    Thanks for your help.

    Regards
    Tony

    --- In femm@yahoogroups.com, Sven Olsen <a1greatdane@y...> wrote:
    > Dear Tony,
    > the results I have with using femm indicates that some thing else
    is wrong in your real world implementation. My real world results is
    normaly at max 5% out from the simulations. Are you sure about your
    quality of steel? It only takes a small lead contenst to render the
    magnetic quality of the steel virtually useless. How about the
    quality of the neo? You say 35N, but are you sure? There's many
    qualities comming out of 'ping-pong land'. Is the neo fully and
    optimally magnetized? It takes a very serius magnetizer to fully
    charge the circuit.
    > Best regards
    > A1greatdane
    >
    > tonyrouget <tonyrouget@y...> wrote:
    > Dear All,
    >
    > First of all, thanks David for your great software!!
    >
    > I have a quick question:
    >
    > Did anybody already experienced any problems to relate Femm
    > simulation results with the real world??
    >
    > And if Yes, what could be the cause of the simulation error.???
    >
    > In other words, I have designed a loudspeaker motor assembly with
    > Neodymium 35 and I was expecting 1.2 to 1.4T in the airgap.
    > Confident of my design and simulation results I built a prototype
    and
    > could only get 0.8T Maximum in my Airgap with the Gaussmeter..
    >
    > I am using 1018 Steel and Neo 35H. I've been inputing the tech
    specs
    > of my magnet and editing a new model in my library..
    >
    > If you had already experienced simulation problems, please give me
    > your input..
    >
    > Regards
    > Tony
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
    Service.
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------
    > Do you Yahoo!?
    > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: [femm] Re: PM design - Simulation results far from Prototype results....
    - From: Sven Olsen <a1greatdane@yahoo.com>

- References:
  - Re: [femm] PM design - Simulation results far from Prototype results....
    - From: Sven Olsen <a1greatdane@yahoo.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: [femm] PM design - Simulation results far from Prototype results....
- Next by Date: Re: [femm] Re: PM design - Simulation results far from Prototype results....
- Previous by thread: Re: [femm] PM design - Simulation results far from Prototype results....
- Next by thread: Re: [femm] Re: PM design - Simulation results far from Prototype results....
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread