[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [femm] [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [femm] [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
- From: David Meeker <dmeeker@foster-miller.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:38:57 -0400
- Organization: Foster-Miller, Inc.
- References: <F63SVMum03yMJiQTyfP000081bf@hotmail.com>

    you se-ho wrote:

    > To Dear All:
    >
    > Probably, my question is little off-bit to this e-mail group. However, If
    > there is anyone who can suggest any thing, it will be great.
    >

    No, your question is on-topic.

    >
    > I implemented FEM to calculate resistance and inductance with published
    > paper. If I see the resistance value, it is always smaller than that of
    > Ansoft's Maxwell. This is more outstanding at higher frequency. If I use
    > much more triangles, then clearly it took much more time, nevertheless the
    > resistance value is always smaller than Maxwell's. When I calculate
    > inductance and resistance, I use same mesh data. I calculate inductance
    > first, then calculate current and resistance. I now feel that I need to some
    > special algorithm to get convergence fast. has somebody any idea ?
    >

    Well, maybe Maxwell's result is just dead wrong : ) Seriously, can you give
    more details about what example you are trying to reproduce (e.g. a reference to
    the paper that you were talking about)? It's hard to say much without knowing
    more.

    Dave Meeker

    begin:vcard
    n:Meeker;David
    tel;fax:781-890-3489
    tel;work:781-684-4070
    x-mozilla-html:TRUE
    url:http://members.aol.com/dcm3c
    org:Foster-Miller, Inc.;Electrical and Electronic Systems Group
    version:2.1
    email;internet:dmeeker@foster-miller.com
    title:Senior Engineer
    adr;quoted-printable:;;350 Second Avenue=0D=0A;Waltham;MA;02451-1196;USA
    fn:David Meeker, Ph.D.
    end:vcard

- References:
  - [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
    - From: "you se-ho" <sxy28@hotmail.com>

- Prev by Date: [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
- Next by Date: Re: [femm] Total current in a high energy disharge.
- Previous by thread: [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
- Next by thread: Re: [femm] [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread