[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [femm] transient analysis

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [femm] transient analysis
- From: William Brodie-Tyrrell <wfbrodie@smug.adelaide.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:55:23 +0930 (CST)
- In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0306161008490.3258-100000@mulder.smug.adelaide.edu.au>

    OK, I've done some of the simulations and put a few graphs up:

    http://users.on.net/gbt/coilgun/

    The reason I post this here is that I'm looking for feedback on the validity
    of the simulation method from people experienced with FEMM; if this is too
    off-topic then I can take it elsewhere.

    William Brodie-Tyrrell

    --
    "There is no God and Dirac is his prophet"
    -- Wolfgang Pauli

    <wfbrodie@smug.adelaide.edu.au>
    http://www.cs.adelaide.edu.au/~william

- References:
  - Re: [femm] transient analysis
    - From: William Brodie-Tyrrell <wfbrodie@smug.adelaide.edu.au>

- Prev by Date: RE: [femm] (unknown)
- Next by Date: Re: [Still Error ocurred.. :-( ]
- Previous by thread: Re: [femm] transient analysis
- Next by thread: femm source
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread