[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# [FEMM] Capacitance benchmarks

- To: "FEMM user group (E-mail)" <femm@list.foster-miller.net>
- Subject: [FEMM] Capacitance benchmarks
- From: Mark Smith <mark.smith@linx.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:17:14 -0000
- List-archive: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/pipermail/femm>
- List-help: <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=help>
- List-id: FEMM mailing list <femm.list.foster-miller.net>
- List-post: <mailto:femm@list.foster-miller.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- Reply-to: FEMM mailing list <femm@list.foster-miller.net>

    Hi all

    I've been putting Bela through some extensive tests (FEMM 4.0 beta) to
    confirm some results I'm getting with my 3D BEM electrostatic solver and I'm
    pleased to say I get good agreement. What I'm looking for is example
    geometries where there are known analytic solutions for the capacitance,
    other than the standard concentric sphere, coaxial conductor etc. Can anyone
    suggest a good source of reference?
    I've done extensive searches with google & I'm just finding lots of the well
    known ones.

    TIA
    Mark

    p.s. David thanks for the acknowledgement in the BELA user's manual. Bela is
    equal to Quickfield IMHO.

    p.p.s It would be nice to have a little more control (refinement) over the
    mesh. I think the speed at which the mesh size grows is too fast ? is this
    not controllable in triangle ?

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 16/10/2003

    The information contained in this e-mail message (and any attachment
    transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the
    exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an addressee, any
    disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this
    communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
    communication in error, please contact us immediately so that we can correct
    the error.

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: [FEMM] Capacitance benchmarks
    - From: David Meeker <dmeeker@foster-miller.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: [FEMM] How do you interpret inductance values? And predict inductor Q?
- Next by Date: [FEMM] Solid block vs laminations - does not compare
- Previous by thread: Re: [FEMM] How do you interpret inductance values? And predict inductor Q?
- Next by thread: Re: [FEMM] Capacitance benchmarks
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread