[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: FEMM Vs. commercial code

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: FEMM Vs. commercial code
- From: "marsupiofr" <marsupio@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:47:05 -0000
- In-reply-to: <3DD4913C.6080106@ieee.org>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    --- In femm@y..., David Meeker <dmeeker@i...> wrote:
    >

    Just a note on the fact that FEMM would not be bullet proof for
    bugs : can we say that commercial programs are really bullet proof
    for bugs ? I do not think so. With my experience, I think honestly
    that FEMM is not more or less stable than a commercial program. I
    really achieved some huge simulations with FEMM for my PhD thesis :
    repeating 15 hours simulation on a 1.2GHz x86 computer with LUA
    automation - no problems and this piece of software really saved my
    life for this PhD thesis.

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: [femm] Re: FEMM Vs. commercial code
    - From: Keith Gregory <k.gregory@lboro.ac.uk>
  - Re: FEMM Vs. commercial code
    - From: "marsupiofr" <marsupio@hotmail.com>

- References:
  - Re: [femm] FEMM Vs. commercial code
    - From: David Meeker <dmeeker@ieee.org>

- Prev by Date: Re: FEMM Vs. commercial code
- Next by Date: Re: [femm] where to find full BH curve of NdFeB magnetic material
- Previous by thread: Re: [femm] FEMM Vs. commercial code
- Next by thread: Re: [femm] Re: FEMM Vs. commercial code
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread