[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [femm] Re: PMSquare FEMM simulations errors ??

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [femm] Re: PMSquare FEMM simulations errors ??
- From: Dave Squires <djsquires@plix.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:26:06 -0700
- References: <9g80ei+hecd@eGroups.com>

    Interesting! Why counter-clockwise? What is the reasoning?

    I asked about this some time ago and Mr Meeker
    said to stay very close to the region boundary, use a fine
    mesh in the region of interest and always draw the contour clockwise.

    Regards,
    Dave Squires

    Jose Roberto Camacho wrote:

    > On 12 Jun 2001, at 15:12, hartiberlin@pop3.freenet.de wrote:
    >
    > > Hi all,
    > >
    > > enclosed is a pic from
    > > the simulation and the
    > > *.fem file.
    > > I get 640.9 N/m butinto the wrong
    > > direction, when I use a clockwise
    > > integration path !
    > >
    > > Is this a FEMMvies error ?
    > > or did I something wrong ???
    > > Regards, Stefan.
    >
    > Dear Sir,
    >
    > In my humble opinion I think you need to make your path in the
    > anti-clockwise direction.
    >
    > Sincerely,
    >
    > Prof. Camacho
    > <jrcamacho@ufu.br>
    >
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

- References:
  - Re: PMSquare FEMM simulations errors ??
    - From: <dcm3c@aol.com>

- Prev by Date: PMsquare thing.
- Next by Date: Re: [femm] Re: FEMM simulations errors ??
- Previous by thread: Re: PMSquare FEMM simulation errors ??
- Next by thread: PMsquare thing.
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread