[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: periodic boundary condition problem

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: periodic boundary condition problem
- From: "Penquista66" <jtapia@die.udec.cl>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 20:13:09 -0000
- In-reply-to: <20021205152855.99289.qmail@web40403.mail.yahoo.com>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    thanks for your help.....I'll try your suggestions

    Juan

    --- In femm@y..., enp enp <riyad20012002@y...> wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > It depends on your problem. If you would like to
    > nalyse no load. You may just model one pole or 1/2
    > pole span of the PM machine.
    > If you analyse the on load operation. you would need
    > to model at least one pole ans set the anti-periodic
    > conditions at the azimutal boundaries.
    > You can also model two poles you must set in this case
    > the periodic conditions on these boundaries.
    > On the radial boundaries in the all cases set Dirchlet
    > conditions, set the the vector potentiel to zero A=0.
    >
    > Riyad
    >
    > ___________________________________________________________
    > Soyez solidaire soutenez l'action du Téléthon avec Yahoo! France.
    > http://www1.telethon.fr/030-Espace-Relais-Dons/webtirelire1.asp?
    hebergeur_id=1309

- References:
  - Re: [femm] periodic boundary condition problem
    - From: enp enp <riyad20012002@yahoo.fr>

- Prev by Date: Re: [femm] periodic boundary condition problem
- Next by Date: Re: [femm] periodic boundary condition problem
- Previous by thread: Re: [femm] periodic boundary condition problem
- Next by thread: Re: [femm] periodic boundary condition problem
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread