[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [femm] mutual inductance

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [femm] mutual inductance
- From: Keith Gregory <k.gregory@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:01:22 +0100
- In-reply-to: <F118XsFFsAitVGeSJIE00010c51@hotmail.com>

`The mutual inductance should be (well must be really) smaller than the square root of the product of the individual self inductances, and mutual may be smaller than both the self-inductances depending on the level of coupling.`
`Keith.`
`At 11:28 18/09/01 -0300, you wrote:`

>     I'm trying to get mutual inductance between rotor coil and stator coil for
>     the model I send you but when I evaluate with femm postprocessor it yiels a
>     smaller value than self inductance for rotor or stator coil.
>     I cant find the problem
>     Can you help me please?

> `mercedes`

>     _________________________________________________________________
>     Descargue GRATUITAMENTE MSN Explorer en http://explorer.msn.es/intl.asp

> ``
> `
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/`

``

- Follow-Ups:
  - transformer capacitance and inductance
    - From: "Erdal Bizkevelci" <erdal@ieee.org>

- References:
  - mutual inductance
    - From: "mercedes sampere" <m_veinti2@hotmail.com>

- Prev by Date: mutual inductance
- Next by Date: transformer capacitance and inductance
- Previous by thread: mutual inductance
- Next by thread: transformer capacitance and inductance
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread