[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: FEMM Vs. commercial code

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: FEMM Vs. commercial code
- From: "jire602000" <jire@club-internet.fr>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:42:10 -0000
- In-reply-to: <004401c28a8c$65ca3380$12c6fea9@tmaxdesk>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    --- In femm@y..., "TMax" <trovamax@i...> wrote:
    > Which are main differences?

    Hello,

    I a new femm user . I am on the engineering side. This is what I
    think.

    ++++++
    It is free with no limitation of mesh or node .It is not a demo
    version.
    You have attached to this software a discussion group which is as
    important as the software itself .Dealing with electromagnetic
    simulation without a good theoretical support (or background) can
    conduct often to false simulation or bad understanding of the
    results. You will often to deal with approximation or assumption even
    before starting you simulation , who will help you them ? People of
    the group. The discussion group is a place you can find engineering
    people and theoretical people . That is gold ! Thanks to David Meeker.
    No comercial code have that !
    The viewer is good . The plotter and the integrator are very
    interesting to extract the results.

    --
    The CAD model constructor is pour . The Lua language can help you.
    DXF files also ?
    No bridge to heat transfer simulation as you can find on commercial
    code.

    Hope it helps ! Try It !

- References:
  - [femm] FEMM Vs. commercial code
    - From: "TMax" <trovamax@inwind.it>

- Prev by Date: Re: [femm] Re: Bobin (L,R) calculation
- Next by Date: where to find full BH curve of NdFeB magnetic material
- Previous by thread: [femm] FEMM Vs. commercial code
- Next by thread: Re: [femm] FEMM Vs. commercial code
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread