[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# boundary conditions

- To: femm@egroups.com
- Subject: boundary conditions
- From: strydah@cybertours.com
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:24:10 -0000
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Thanks to all who offered a solution. As Dave pointed out the
    problem was with magnet orientation, and the 90 degree rotation did
    the trick. Primarily I thought I was omitting boundary definitions of
    the magnet,hence the misleading question. I also tried modelling it
    as a current sheet as suggested in the manual and came out with
    similar results.

- Follow-Ups:
  - Permanent Magnet Models.
    - From: Sebastia Jardi Estadella <sje@tinet.org>

- Prev by Date: Re: [femm] parametric study
- Next by Date: Re: [femm] Modelling a magnetometer
- Previous by thread: Re: [femm] boundary conditions
- Next by thread: Permanent Magnet Models.
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread