[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [FEMM] Updated development version

- To: FEMM mailing list <femm@list.foster-miller.net>
- Subject: Re: [FEMM] Updated development version
- From: Wijono <wijono@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
- In-reply-to: <407C2CAE.4CBF861D@plix.com>
- List-archive: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/pipermail/femm>
- List-help: <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=help>
- List-id: FEMM mailing list <femm.list.foster-miller.net>
- List-post: <mailto:femm@list.foster-miller.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- Reply-to: FEMM mailing list <femm@list.foster-miller.net>

    Dear David,
    In addition to Dave Squires problem, if we close
    (exit) the FEMM, it exits without any question.
    Does it mean that FEMM saves everything automatically.
    If not, is the changing (in Dave problem) not saved by
    FEMM (just saved in buffer)?
    Many thanks.

    Regards,
    Wijono

    --- Dave Squires <djsquires@plix.com> wrote:
    > David,
    > I found a bug in the code.  It shows up in FEMMVIEW
    > and is not obvious
    > at first.
    >
    > 1. Use a design of your choosing and run FEMM and
    > then bring it
    >    up in FEMMVIEW.  No problem.
    > 2. Now go back to the original design and change a
    > geometry dimension.
    >    In my case I changed the thickness of a flux
    > return ring in M19 steel
    >    with the objective of getting closer to
    > saturation to reduce weight.
    > 3. Run the FEMM simulation again using the same
    > filename.
    > 4. Now bring up the new run in FEMMVIEW.  You will
    > see that the change
    >    of the geometry is the same as the original. It
    > doesn't get carried
    >    across to FEMMVIEW. For some reason FEMMVIEW uses
    > the original
    > geometry
    >    from the first run. You don't see the change in
    > FEMMVIEW.
    >
    > In my case the thinner flux return ring didn't show
    > up. It stayed the
    > same
    > as the thicker first run case.  Looks like you
    > overlooked something in
    > reloading and/or clicking on the answer file icon.
    > Seems it doesn't
    > matter
    > if you select the file from the window list and
    > reload or click on the
    > answer icon. It probably is an easy fix.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Dave Squires
    >
    > > David Meeker wrote:
    > >
    > > All--
    > >
    > > I've put up a new development version of the code
    > in the files section
    > > at:
    > > http://femm.foster-miller.net/files.htm
    > >
    > _______________________________________________
    > FEMM mailing list
    > FEMM@list.foster-miller.net
    > http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm

    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
    http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: [FEMM] Updated development version
    - From: David Meeker <dmeeker@ieee.org>

- References:
  - Re: [FEMM] Updated development version
    - From: Dave Squires <djsquires@plix.com>

- Prev by Date: [FEMM] Bug report
- Next by Date: Re: [FEMM] some lua questions
- Previous by thread: Re: [FEMM] Updated development version
- Next by thread: Re: [FEMM] Updated development version
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread