[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?

- To: "FEMM mailing list" <femm@list.foster-miller.net>
- Subject: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
- From: "Bengt Dahlberg" <d.bengt@bredband.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:27:46 +0100
- List-archive: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/pipermail/femm>
- List-help: <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=help>
- List-id: FEMM mailing list <femm.list.foster-miller.net>
- List-post: <mailto:femm@list.foster-miller.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <000801c3e39c$a47043d0$6500a8c0@bengt><6.0.0.22.0.20040126130551.02626818@staff-mailin.lboro.ac.uk> <001101c3e418$a7193160$670ee818@default>
- Reply-to: FEMM mailing list <femm@list.foster-miller.net>

Thanks everyone. Problem seems too be solved. I didn't take in to consideration alnicos por ability too resh over larger distances. Best regards. Bengt Dahlberg

- References:
  - [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
    - From: "Bengt Dahlberg" <d.bengt@bredband.net>
  - Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
    - From: Keith Gregory <K.Gregory@lboro.ac.uk>
  - Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
    - From: "Antonio F.R. Carabio" <ingacarabio@fibertel.com.ar>

- Prev by Date: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
- Next by Date: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
- Next by thread: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread