[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [femm] periodic boundary condition problem

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [femm] periodic boundary condition problem
- From: enp enp <riyad20012002@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:28:55 +0100 (CET)
- In-reply-to: <asnjdm+2bki@eGroups.com>

    Hi,

    It depends on your problem. If you would like to
    nalyse no load. You may just model one pole or 1/2
    pole span of the PM machine.
    If you analyse the on load operation. you would need
    to model at least one pole ans set the anti-periodic
    conditions at the azimutal boundaries.
    You can also model two poles you must set in this case
    the periodic conditions on these boundaries.
    On the radial boundaries in the all cases set Dirchlet
    conditions, set the the vector potentiel to zero A=0.

    Riyad

    ___________________________________________________________
    Soyez solidaire soutenez l?action du Téléthon avec Yahoo! France.
    http://www1.telethon.fr/030-Espace-Relais-Dons/webtirelire1.asp?hebergeur_id=1309

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: periodic boundary condition problem
    - From: "Penquista66" <jtapia@die.udec.cl>
  - Re: [femm] periodic boundary condition problem
    - From: David Meeker <dmeeker@ieee.org>

- References:
  - periodic boundary condition problem
    - From: "Penquista66" <jtapia@die.udec.cl>

- Prev by Date: periodic boundary condition problem
- Next by Date: Re: periodic boundary condition problem
- Previous by thread: periodic boundary condition problem
- Next by thread: Re: periodic boundary condition problem
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread