[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [femm] Electric circuits vs. material current density

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [femm] Electric circuits vs. material current density
- From: Fernando Seco <fseco@iai.csic.es>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 18:15:40 +0200
- Organization: Instituto de Automática Industrial
- References: <3AC45B25.538223D1@iai.csic.es> <3AC4BCE4.A4F81827@foster-miller.com>

    Hello David,

    As always, thanks for your quick help. I understand the
    difference. If you don't use circuits, you fix Js, but when you
    measure you get Js-Jeddy. Using a circuit, you force the program
    to give (Js-Jeddy)*(Cross Area)=I(circuit), by raising the voltage.
    So basically I'm seeing... the inductance of the coil! I can't
    believe I passed Electromagnetics at college... :-)

    Greetings from Spain,

    --

    Fernando Seco
    fseco@iai.csic.es
    http://www.iai.csic.es/users/fseco

- References:
  - Electric circuits vs. material current density
    - From: Fernando Seco <fseco@iai.csic.es>
  - Re: [femm] Electric circuits vs. material current density
    - From: David Meeker <dmeeker@foster-miller.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: [femm] lan transformers
- Next by Date: "Small skin depth" Impedance Boundary Condition
- Previous by thread: Re: [femm] Electric circuits vs. material current density
- Next by thread: "Small skin depth" Impedance Boundary Condition
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread