[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]

- To: femm@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
- From: "you se-ho" <sxy28@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:55:40

`
To Dear All:`
`Probably, my question is little off-bit to this e-mail group. However, If there is anyone who can suggest any thing, it will be great.`
`I implemented FEM to calculate resistance and inductance with published paper. If I see the resistance value, it is always smaller than that of Ansoft's Maxwell. This is more outstanding at higher frequency. If I use much more triangles, then clearly it took much more time, nevertheless the resistance value is always smaller than Maxwell's. When I calculate inductance and resistance, I use same mesh data. I calculate inductance first, then calculate current and resistance. I now feel that I need to some special algorithm to get convergence fast. has somebody any idea ?`

    Thank you very much.
    Sincerely,
    SE-HO YOU

`(ps) Would any tell me which file(s) calculate field parameters in FEMM ?`
``

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: [femm] [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
    - From: David Meeker <dmeeker@foster-miller.com>
  - Re: [femm] [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
    - From: "sihang" <stsc_sh@sina.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Total current in a high energy disharge.
- Next by Date: Re: [femm] [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
- Previous by thread: Re: [femm] Total current in a high energy disharge.
- Next by thread: Re: [femm] [Resistance and Inductance as a function of frequnecy]
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread