[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [FEMM] Serious doubt about FEMM3.3 XY graphics

- To: FEMM mailing list <femm@list.foster-miller.net>
- Subject: Re: [FEMM] Serious doubt about FEMM3.3 XY graphics
- From: David Meeker <dmeeker@ieee.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:01:15 -0500
- In-reply-to: <1080258847.4063711f57433@www.if.ufrj.br>
- List-archive: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/pipermail/femm>
- List-help: <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=help>
- List-id: FEMM mailing list <femm.list.foster-miller.net>
- List-post: <mailto:femm@list.foster-miller.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <BAY14-F21FFf70DQLGJ00023138@hotmail.com> <40549B2D.7050003@ieee.org> <1080258847.4063711f57433@www.if.ufrj.br>
- Reply-to: FEMM mailing list <femm@list.foster-miller.net>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MultiZilla/1.6.0.0e

`agnaldo@if.ufrj.br wrote:`

> `Dear dave I´m using FEMM3.3 for performing the calculatins of my doctoral thesis, but I´ve recently found a strange thing: when I anlyse the results of an axisymetric modelling, and ask the vector potential graphics, the resulting graphics come with the title "Flux, Wb". How can it be? If in the list of XY plots, I click on the "potential", how can appear a result of Magnetic flux (measured in Weber)and not the vector potential (measured in Weber/m)?
> Otherwise, if I ask the XY graphics of the potential vector of a planar model, the results come called potential, measured in Weber/m, as I expect.
> This definition is very important to my simulations, could you (or anybody else)help me?`
> `Agnaldo`

`Rather than A, the XY plots for the axisymmetric case report 2*Pi*r*A, which is in the units of Webers. I do this because for axisymmetric problems, flux lines are actually level contours of 2*Pi*r*A, rather than level contours of A.`
`Also see: http://femm.foster-miller.net/pipermail/femm/2000-September/000218.html`
`Dave.`

- Follow-Ups:
  - [FEMM] Magnetization curves
    - From: agnaldo@if.ufrj.br

- References:
  - [FEMM] Solenoid charge
    - From: "yanze wuan" <yanzewuan@hotmail.com>
  - Re: [FEMM] Solenoid charge
    - From: David Meeker <dmeeker@ieee.org>
  - [FEMM] Serious doubt about FEMM3.3 XY graphics
    - From: agnaldo@if.ufrj.br

- Prev by Date: [FEMM] modeling coils???
- Next by Date: RE: [FEMM] modeling coils???
- Previous by thread: [FEMM] Serious doubt about FEMM3.3 XY graphics
- Next by thread: [FEMM] Magnetization curves
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread