[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# RE: [femm] script convention

- To: <femm@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: RE: [femm] script convention
- From: "Carl Kopin" <ckopin@davinciresearch.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 06:48:45 -0700
- Thread-index: AcE12YXbTU6hg5ZOT8OtpRyh2v8s7AAN1/9Q
- Thread-topic: [femm] script convention

    You are right on target Keith,
    What I meant were the Lua script for femm.
    Carl

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Keith Gregory [mailto:k.gregory@lboro.ac.uk]
    Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 00:07
    To:	femm@yahoogroups.com
    Subject:	RE: [femm] script convention

    At 12:47 04/09/01 -0700, you wrote:

    >I prefer consistency in commands/arguments naming convention: by using
    >the underscore to separate words in commands/arguments no one has to
    >guess where one word ends and the next begins.
    >Carl

    As far as I can see Lua itself does not use the underscore except when
    it's
    adding things like "lua" to the front of commands which are used for the

    application program interface. The normal lua commands, those which are
    not
    FEMM specific but that are likely to be used in scripts, are simple
    compounds such as openfile(), closefile(), readfrom(), writeto() etc. In
    my
    view it is sensible to keep this convention so that all script commands
    are
    the same, i.e. no underscore.

    Keith.

    Keith Gregory
    Department of Electronic & Electrical Engineering
    Loughborough University
    Phone: 01509 227025 Fax: 01509 227014
    Department web: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/el/

    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: [femm] script convention
    - From: David Meeker <dmeeker@foster-miller.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: showdensityplot
- Next by Date: Re: [femm] script convention
- Previous by thread: RE: [femm] script convention
- Next by thread: Re: [femm] script convention
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread