[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [femm] help
mercedes sampere wrote:
> David,
> I'm searching on dispersion reactance for induction motors, so actually I'm
> interested about self inductance but I calculate mutual inductance in order
> to have an idea if the model is OK.
> I took the model for this motor from a design handbook and that's why I
> think I'm doing something wrong, because it doesn't make sence that self
> inductance would be greater than mutual inductance for a motor, unless it is
> not properly designed.
> You're right about coils, what do I have to do to drive them in series?
> About current, in the original model stator current was 88.8 A but I've
> increased it to see if I could get less leakage.
> These are motor features:
> Usefull power: 81kW
> Tension: 380/660V
> Synchronous speed: 1500rpm
> Frecuency: 50Hz
> Number of phases: 3
> 2 pairs of poles
> Power factor: 0.89
> Sliding coefficient: 0.0133
> Current per phase(stator): 88.8 A
> Number of slots(stator): 48
> Current per phase(rotor): 377 A
> Number of slots(rotor): 36
>
> Should I get better results if I model the hole geometry (I mean not only
> two slots)?
>
> Thank you very much
> Excuse my english
>
> Mercedes
>
I think when you say "dispersion reactance" that you mean what I'd think of as
"leakage reactance." What you need to model depends sort of on what you are
trying to get. If you are just interested in slot leakage, you'd probably do
well enough by just modeling the inside of a slot, applying an A=0 boundary
condition across the slot opening an a dA/dn boundary condition (which gets
applied by default if you don't specify anything) to the slot walls. Then, you
don't have to model any of the core at all. You can then get the slot leakage
inductance via the magnetic field energy.
On the other hand, if you really want the mutual inductance between the stator
and rotor, you have to end up modeling at least a pole's worth of the machine
(and applying appropriate periodic boundary conditions).
Dave.
--------------A1B3FAE31969430F061B5E66
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
mercedes sampere wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>David,
<br>I'm searching on dispersion reactance for induction motors, so actually
I'm
<br>interested about self inductance but I calculate mutual inductance
in order
<br>to have an idea if the model is OK.
<br>I took the model for this motor from a design handbook and that's why
I
<br>think I'm doing something wrong, because it doesn't make sence that
self
<br>inductance would be greater than mutual inductance for a motor, unless
it is
<br>not properly designed.
<br>You're right about coils, what do I have to do to drive them in series?
<br>About current, in the original model stator current was 88.8 A but
I've
<br>increased it to see if I could get less leakage.
<br>These are motor features:
<br>Usefull power: 81kW
<br>Tension: 380/660V
<br>Synchronous speed: 1500rpm
<br>Frecuency: 50Hz
<br>Number of phases: 3
<br>2 pairs of poles
<br>Power factor: 0.89
<br>Sliding coefficient: 0.0133
<br>Current per phase(stator): 88.8 A
<br>Number of slots(stator): 48
<br>Current per phase(rotor): 377 A
<br>Number of slots(rotor): 36
<p>Should I get better results if I model the hole geometry (I mean not
only
<br>two slots)?
<p>Thank you very much
<br>Excuse my english
<p>Mercedes
<br><a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";></a> </blockquote>
I think when you say "dispersion reactance" that you mean what I'd think
of as "leakage reactance." What you need to model depends sort of
on what you are trying to get. If you are just interested in slot
leakage, you'd probably do well enough by just modeling the inside of a
slot, applying an A=0 boundary condition across the slot opening an a dA/dn
boundary condition (which gets applied by default if you don't specify
anything) to the slot walls. Then, you don't have to model any of
the core at all. You can then get the slot leakage inductance via
the magnetic field energy.
<p>On the other hand, if you really want the mutual inductance between
the stator and rotor, you have to end up modeling at least a pole's worth
of the machine (and applying appropriate periodic boundary conditions).
<p>Dave.
<br> </html>
--------------A1B3FAE31969430F061B5E66--
begin:vcard
n:Meeker;David
tel;fax:781-890-3489
tel;work:781-684-4070
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/dcm3c
org:Foster-Miller, Inc.;Electrical and Electronic Systems Group
version:2.1
email;internet:dmeeker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
title:Senior Engineer
adr;quoted-printable:;;350 Second Avenue=0D=0A;Waltham;MA;02451-1196;USA
fn:David Meeker, Ph.D.
end:vcard