[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?

To: "FEMM mailing list" <femm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
From: "Bengt Dahlberg" <d.bengt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:27:46 +0100
List-archive: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/pipermail/femm>
List-help: <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=help>
List-id: FEMM mailing list <femm.list.foster-miller.net>
List-post: <mailto:femm@list.foster-miller.net>
List-subscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://femm.foster-miller.net/mailman/listinfo/femm>, <mailto:femm-request@list.foster-miller.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <000801c3e39c$a47043d0$6500a8c0@bengt><6.0.0.22.0.20040126130551.02626818@staff-mailin.lboro.ac.uk> <001101c3e418$a7193160$670ee818@default>
Reply-to: FEMM mailing list <femm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks everyone.

Problem seems too be solved. I didn't take in to consideration alnicos por ability too resh over larger distances.

Best regards. Bengt Dahlberg

References:
- [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
  - From: Bengt Dahlberg
- Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
  - From: Keith Gregory
- Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
  - From: Antonio F.R. Carabio

Prev by Date: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
Next by Date: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
Previous by thread: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
Next by thread: Re: [FEMM] alnico5 versus ceramic5 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread