[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
hysteresis losses in enclosures
Hello All,
First of all, I'm new to this newsgroup and also to FEA and FEMM in
particular. Having studied in Germany, I'll do my best to translate
what little I know of electromagnetics into English.
I'm trying to model hysteresis and eddy current losses we are
experiencing in certain parts of enclosures of high-voltage
switchgear our company is developing.
The enclosures are oval, with half-circles (46 cm diameter) on each
end, connected by parallel straight walls of 90 cm length. Thickness
is 1 cm. Height varies between 80 and 150 cm for various design
options. In this are, equally spaced with 45 cm, the three round
aluminium conductors (diameter 10 cm) for phases R,S and T. Current
is 4000 Amps (rms) at 50 Hz.
The enclosure is filled with insulating gas (mu rel. = 1), the
outside is plain air.
Trying to reduce cost, the enclosures are made of low-grade steel
known as Fe37, which has similar properties as the Steel M-36 from
the Materials Library of FEMM. (mu rel. approx. 1600, sigma = 9.5
MS/m)
Experimental measurements of heat production result in 300-600 W/m2
on the high-stressed left and right sides.
However, results from FEMM show a maximum |B| of 0.15 T, reducing
rapidly towards the outside. According to the hysteris curves I have,
this should result in far less than 100 W/m2 hysteresis losses. Eddy
current losses are then also neglegible.
I'm using the following (planar) geometry:
_______
/ \
| O O O |
\_______/ \_Fe37, 1 cm thickness
R S T
R: I=5657 + j0 Amps
S: I=-2828 - j4898 Amps
T: I=-2828 + j4898 Amps
And now my questions, related to FEMM:
1. Why is the electrical conductivity of ALL steels in FEMM set to 0?
I'm using 9.5 MS/m as a normal value, about 1/3 of the 34.4 MS/m of
Al.
2. Can I model various phase-shifted currents by setting the real and
imaginary parts of the current density? I'm using 0.72 MA/m2
(resulting in a total peak value of 4000xsrt(2) Amps for the given
conductors).
3. What boundary conditions to specify for this kind of problems?
4. Along the inner surface of the enclosure, I've specified a mesh of
0.02 cm. Is this fine enough given the skin dept of slightly less
than 1 mm? More nodes seems to crash this machine :-(
5. Does anyone know a steel with a relative permeability of around
1600 with 'worse' hysteresis properties as the M-36 steel?
6. If |H| and |B| are known, then how do I estimate the resulting
heat losess for this situation. I only have detailed curves for
laminated transformer steels for |B| > 1 T, which of course are
softer ferrites.
I would appreciate the comments or experiences of anybody who has
ever used FEMM for AC current magnetic fields.
Thanks in advance,
Erik Evertz
VA TECH ELIN HOLEC HIGH VOLTAGE BV
R&D Dep.
Amersfoort,The Netherlands