[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [femm] transient analysis

To: femm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [femm] transient analysis
From: William Brodie-Tyrrell <wfbrodie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:55:23 +0930 (CST)
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0306161008490.3258-100000@mulder.smug.adelaide.edu.au>

OK, I've done some of the simulations and put a few graphs up:

http://users.on.net/gbt/coilgun/

The reason I post this here is that I'm looking for feedback on the validity
of the simulation method from people experienced with FEMM; if this is too
off-topic then I can take it elsewhere.

William Brodie-Tyrrell

--
"There is no God and Dirac is his prophet"
-- Wolfgang Pauli

<wfbrodie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.cs.adelaide.edu.au/~william

References:
- Re: [femm] transient analysis
  - From: William Brodie-Tyrrell

Prev by Date: RE: [femm] (unknown)
Next by Date: Re: [Still Error ocurred.. :-( ]
Previous by thread: Re: [femm] transient analysis
Next by thread: femm source
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread